CAT 2018 Slot 1 VARC RC Passage 1 Q1–Q5
A reading comprehension passage from the Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) section of CAT 2018 Slot 1, with 5 questions (RC · Science & Technology). Answers are CAT's official key.
The passage
Recycling plastic is to saving the Earth what hammering a nail is to halting a falling skyscraper. You struggle to find a place to do it and feel pleased when you succeed. But your effort is wholly inadequate and distracts from the real problem of why the building is collapsing in the first place. The real problem is that single-use plastic—the very idea of producing plastic items like grocery bags, which we use for an average of 12 minutes but can persist in the environment for half a millennium—is an incredibly reckless abuse of technology. Encouraging individuals to recycle more will never solve the problem of a massive production of single-use plastic that should have been avoided in the first place.
As an ecologist and evolutionary biologist, I have had a disturbing window into the accumulating literature on the hazards of plastic pollution. Scientists have long recognized that plastics biodegrade slowly, if at all, and pose multiple threats to wildlife through entanglement and consumption. More recent reports highlight dangers posed by absorption of toxic chemicals in the water and by plastic odors that mimic some species’ natural food. Plastics also accumulate up the food chain, and studies now show that we are likely ingesting it ourselves in seafood. . . .
Beginning in the 1950s, big beverage companies like Coca-Cola and Anheuser-Busch, along with Phillip Morris and others, formed a non-profit called Keep America Beautiful. Its mission is/was to educate and encourage environmental stewardship in the public. . . . At face value, these efforts seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play in the plastic problem. This clever misdirection has led journalist and author Heather Rogers to describe Keep America Beautiful as the first corporate greenwashing front, as it has helped shift the public focus to consumer recycling behavior and actively thwarted legislation that would increase extended producer responsibility for waste management. . . . [T]he greatest success of Keep America Beautiful has been to shift the onus of environmental responsibility onto the public while simultaneously becoming a trusted name in the environmental movement. . . .
So what can we do to make responsible use of plastic a reality? First: reject the lie. Litterbugs are not responsible for the global ecological disaster of plastic. Humans can only function to the best of their abilities, given time, mental bandwidth and systemic constraints. Our huge problem with plastic is the result of a permissive legal framework that has allowed the uncontrolled rise of plastic pollution, despite clear evidence of the harm it causes to local communities and the world’s oceans. Recycling is also too hard in most parts of the U.S. and lacks the proper incentives to make it work well.
Question 1
- Arecycling all plastic debris in the seabed.
- Bhaving all consumers change their plastic consumption habits.
- Ccompletely banning all single-use plastic bags.
- Dpassing regulations targeted at producers that generate plastic products.
Answer: (D) passing regulations targeted at producers that generate plastic products. RC · Science & Technology MCQ
Solution
- The author blames 'a permissive legal framework' and corporate polluters, and praises the legislation that Keep America Beautiful 'thwarted', which would 'increase extended producer responsibility'.
- So the author would most support regulations aimed at producers, which is option D.
- B is the very 'lie' the author rejects. C (a total ban on bags) is more specific and extreme than anything proposed, and A is never discussed.
Question 2
- Aslow pace of degradation or non-degradation of plastics in the environment.
- Bair pollution caused during the process of recycling plastics.
- Cpoisonous chemicals released into the water and food we consume.
- Dadverse impacts on the digestive systems of animals exposed to plastic.
Answer: (B) air pollution caused during the process of recycling plastics. RC · Science & Technology MCQ
Solution
- Harms listed: slow or no biodegradation (A), toxic chemicals absorbed in water and plastics entering the food chain via seafood (C), and wildlife entanglement and consumption (D).
- Air pollution from recycling is never mentioned, so B is the exception.
Question 3
- Ablame assigned to consumersfor indiscriminate use of plastics.
- Bunderstatement of the enormity of the plastics pollution problem.
- Cfact that people do not know they have been lied to.
- Dunderstatement of the effects of recycling plastics.
Answer: (A) blame assigned to consumersfor indiscriminate use of plastics. RC · Science & Technology MCQ
Solution
- 'The lie is that blame for the plastic problem is wasteful consumers and that changing our individual habits will fix it.'
- So 'lie' refers to blaming consumers, which is option A. B is wrong because the author agrees the problem is huge, and C confuses the lie with not knowing about it.
Question 4
- Arelying on emerging technologies to mitigate the ill-effects of plastic pollution.
- Bencouraging the responsible production of plastics by firms.
- Cfocusing on consumer behaviour to tackle the problem of plastics pollution.
- Dfocusing on single-use plastic bags to reduce the plastics footprint.
Answer: (C) focusing on consumer behaviour to tackle the problem of plastics pollution. RC · Science & Technology MCQ
Solution
- The analogy compares recycling (an individual consumer act) to hammering a nail into a collapsing building: well meant but wholly inadequate, and a distraction from the real cause.
- So the phrase describes focusing on consumer behaviour to tackle plastic pollution, which is option C. D names the real problem (single-use plastic), not the futile effort.
Question 5
- Aa "greenwash" because it was a benevolent attempt to improve public recycling habits.
- Ba sham as it diverted attention away from the role of corporates in plastics pollution.
- Can important step in sensitising producers to the need to tackle plastics pollution.
- Dan innovative example of a collaborative corporate social responsibility initiative.
Answer: (B) a sham as it diverted attention away from the role of corporates in plastics pollution. RC · Science & Technology MCQ
Solution
- The author says its efforts 'seem benevolent, but they obscure the real problem, which is the role that corporate polluters play', calls it 'clever misdirection', and says it shifted the onus onto the public.
- So it is a sham that diverted attention from corporates, which is option B. A gets the reason for 'greenwash' backwards, and C and D praise it.